<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scientific Debates: When Theory Outpaces Data</title>
	<link>http://www.anthonares.net/2006/07/scientific-debates-when-theory-outpaces-data.html</link>
	<description>Chronicling and Commenting on Human Progress</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 12:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Kendall</title>
		<link>http://www.anthonares.net/2006/07/scientific-debates-when-theory-outpaces-data.html#comment-3212</link>
		<author>Anthony Kendall</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 03:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.anthonares.net/2006/07/scientific-debates-when-theory-outpaces-data.html#comment-3212</guid>
		<description>Adam,
The most I know about it is from a somewhat recent issue of NOVA (or some similar program).  From what I remember from the program the technologies used to create the Solutrean spear points and the Clovis points were substantially different.  Nevertheless, the superficial resemblance was fairly striking.

The major difficulties with the European hypothesis is that the North Sea and most of northwest Europe was totally covered in ice as the time.  The Bering land bridge (or Beringia, if that's what it's still called), was around and relatively temperate, though.  So, in terms of a likely pathway it seems that Asia is still the stronger candidate based on what we know now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam,<br />
The most I know about it is from a somewhat recent issue of NOVA (or some similar program).  From what I remember from the program the technologies used to create the Solutrean spear points and the Clovis points were substantially different.  Nevertheless, the superficial resemblance was fairly striking.</p>
<p>The major difficulties with the European hypothesis is that the North Sea and most of northwest Europe was totally covered in ice as the time.  The Bering land bridge (or Beringia, if that&#8217;s what it&#8217;s still called), was around and relatively temperate, though.  So, in terms of a likely pathway it seems that Asia is still the stronger candidate based on what we know now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Crowl</title>
		<link>http://www.anthonares.net/2006/07/scientific-debates-when-theory-outpaces-data.html#comment-3209</link>
		<author>Adam Crowl</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 00:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.anthonares.net/2006/07/scientific-debates-when-theory-outpaces-data.html#comment-3209</guid>
		<description>What do you think of the recent theory that Clovis is linked to the European Solutrean culture? And that the Asiatic Amerindians might be a different group, perhaps earlier than the mega-mammal hunters?

There's a substantial time-gap between the Solutrean and Clovis, but perhaps no more than evidenced by the difference between the two. An intermediate habitat might be a 'bridge' between the two, though anyone's guess where that was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you think of the recent theory that Clovis is linked to the European Solutrean culture? And that the Asiatic Amerindians might be a different group, perhaps earlier than the mega-mammal hunters?</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a substantial time-gap between the Solutrean and Clovis, but perhaps no more than evidenced by the difference between the two. An intermediate habitat might be a &#8216;bridge&#8217; between the two, though anyone&#8217;s guess where that was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
