<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Spacecraft that Revolutionized Cosmology</title>
	<link>http://www.anthonares.net/2006/03/the-spacecraft-that-revolutionized-cosmology.html</link>
	<description>Chronicling and Commenting on Human Progress</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 21:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Malcolm E. Schrader</title>
		<link>http://www.anthonares.net/2006/03/the-spacecraft-that-revolutionized-cosmology.html#comment-4089</link>
		<author>Malcolm E. Schrader</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Sep 2006 16:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.anthonares.net/2006/03/the-spacecraft-that-revolutionized-cosmology.html#comment-4089</guid>
		<description>Actually, historically, the idea of a big bang has been  inimical to the anti-religion philosophers, who preferred to deal with a steady state world that had no beginning or end, obviating the need for a creator. Evidence for the big-bang came as a shock to them. The not-so-literalist bible followers, on the other hand, happily seized on this discovery as strong backing for the idea of a creation, which was followed by a programmed evolution (first chapter Genesis, first account of "creation"). Looking upon that account  as a work of the human intellect, there was no expectation of all the details being accurate, but rather astonishment at the  resemblance to modern knowledge of evolution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, historically, the idea of a big bang has been  inimical to the anti-religion philosophers, who preferred to deal with a steady state world that had no beginning or end, obviating the need for a creator. Evidence for the big-bang came as a shock to them. The not-so-literalist bible followers, on the other hand, happily seized on this discovery as strong backing for the idea of a creation, which was followed by a programmed evolution (first chapter Genesis, first account of &#8220;creation&#8221;). Looking upon that account  as a work of the human intellect, there was no expectation of all the details being accurate, but rather astonishment at the  resemblance to modern knowledge of evolution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.anthonares.net/2006/03/the-spacecraft-that-revolutionized-cosmology.html#comment-255</link>
		<author>Bruce</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 02:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.anthonares.net/2006/03/the-spacecraft-that-revolutionized-cosmology.html#comment-255</guid>
		<description>Excellent article, Anthony!  I've been so busy with work and other things that I haven't been keeping up with blog writing or reading - not even yours, sad to say.  Top notch as usual.  Interesting that I happened to write on something related to biblical vs. physics-based origin ideas in my blog today before seeing this (thanks for your comment there, BTW).  

I'm off to Taiwan in about 24 hours.  Travel season is starting.  Fortunately Asia is pretty well wired for broadband so I should be able to keep in touch (maybe better than recent weeks!).  

-Bruce</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent article, Anthony!  I&#8217;ve been so busy with work and other things that I haven&#8217;t been keeping up with blog writing or reading - not even yours, sad to say.  Top notch as usual.  Interesting that I happened to write on something related to biblical vs. physics-based origin ideas in my blog today before seeing this (thanks for your comment there, BTW).  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m off to Taiwan in about 24 hours.  Travel season is starting.  Fortunately Asia is pretty well wired for broadband so I should be able to keep in touch (maybe better than recent weeks!).  </p>
<p>-Bruce</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
