<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nuclear Fusion Energy: Where are We Now?</title>
	<link>http://www.anthonares.net/2006/01/nuclear-fusion-energy-where-are-we-now.html</link>
	<description>Chronicling and Commenting on Human Progress</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 04:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Driving Blind</title>
		<link>http://www.anthonares.net/2006/01/nuclear-fusion-energy-where-are-we-now.html#comment-34975</link>
		<author>Driving Blind</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 23:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.anthonares.net/2006/01/nuclear-fusion-energy-where-are-we-now.html#comment-34975</guid>
		<description>The process of Fusion reactions using the isotope of Helium known as Helium 3 is doable.  It is not a mad mans dream to mine the moons supplies of Helium 3 for use a Fusion fuel here on Earth.  it is not impossible it is merely difficult.  How difficult will it be to pay for this ridiculous endeavor in Iraq?  How diificult will it be cleaning up the debris from all the massive high energy storms produced by global warming.  That is to say if we are able to clean it up since we all be under water or burried in ice</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The process of Fusion reactions using the isotope of Helium known as Helium 3 is doable.  It is not a mad mans dream to mine the moons supplies of Helium 3 for use a Fusion fuel here on Earth.  it is not impossible it is merely difficult.  How difficult will it be to pay for this ridiculous endeavor in Iraq?  How diificult will it be cleaning up the debris from all the massive high energy storms produced by global warming.  That is to say if we are able to clean it up since we all be under water or burried in ice</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wladimir Guglinski</title>
		<link>http://www.anthonares.net/2006/01/nuclear-fusion-energy-where-are-we-now.html#comment-33454</link>
		<author>Wladimir Guglinski</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 12:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.anthonares.net/2006/01/nuclear-fusion-energy-where-are-we-now.html#comment-33454</guid>
		<description>I would like to say some words concerning what said by the journalist Bob Weber:
"Regardless of experimental results, one needs a convincing theory of CF"
in the link:
http://www.strategykinetics.com/2006/02/cold_fusion.html


Before to understand cold fusion, we neeed to have a complete understanding of the nuclear phenomena.  However we dont have it.


In the Introduction of my book QUANTUM RING THEORY, it is written in the page 4:
....................................................
&#8220;Perhaps one would like to say that the foundations for cold fusion are the same of that proposed in Quantum Mechanics. Indeed, in Jan-2004 the cold fusion researcher Dr. Dimitriy Afonichev sent me an e-mail where he said the following:
&#8216;I think that occurrence of cold fusion can be explained on the basis of the existing theories&#8217;. 
Truthfully his words transmit not merely a personal opinion, because actually several theorists those try to explain the cold fusion occurrence share his viewpoint. However such opinion is very intriguing, since the own academic community is agreeing that the existing theories in the branch of Nuclear Physics are unable to explain even the ordinary nuclear properties, as confessed by Eisberg and Resnick in their book Quantum Physics, where they say in the first page of the Chapter 15: 
&#8216;Though we dispose nowadays of a sufficient complete assembly of information about the nuclear forces, we realize that they are too much complexes, not having been possible up to now to use this acknowledge for building an extensive theory of the nuclei. In other words, we cannot explain the whole properties of nuclei in function of the properties of the nuclear forces that actuate on their protons and neutrons&#8217;. 
So, as the existing theories are unable to explain the nuclear properties responsible for the hot fusion occurrence (which occurs according to the principles of Quantum Mechanics), it's hard to believe that such existing theories could explain nuclear properties that would be responsible for the occurrence of some so much complex as it is the cold fusion (which occurs by infringing the principles of QM). &#8220;
....................................................


For a layman to understand easily that said in the Introduction of my book, take for instance the interaction between two neutrons.
Two neutrons have no repulsion.  But in a short distance, they are attracted by the strong force.  So, after interacting within a nucleus, two neutrons would have to form the 0n2, and would never separate anymore.
But 0n2 does not exist in nature.  Heisenberg tried to explain it with the introduciton of the concept of Isospin.  Unfortunatelly the isospin is an abstract mathematical concept.  
Two neutrons tied strongly by the strong force cannot be separated by an abstract concept, because an abstract concept cannot produce a FORCE capable to win the force of attraction by the strong force.
Only a FORCE of repulsion can win the force of attraction.
A NEW NUCLEAR MODEL (that shows what is the force of repulsion between two neutrons in short distances) is proposed in my book Quantum Ring theory.



In 2002 the Infinite Energy magazine has published my paper &#8220;What is Missing in Les Case&#8217;s Catalytc Fusion&#8221; , in which I have proposed some improvements to be addopted, in order to avoid the missing of replicability.

In 2003 in the ICCF-10 Lets and Cravens exhibited their experiment, in which they have adopted the suggestions of mine in my paper published in 2002 by IE.


In my book I propose an explanation for Lets-Cravens experiment, showed in paper entitled &#8220;Lets-Cravens Experiment and the Accordion-Effect&#8221;


The Accordion-Effect is a nuclear property unknown by nuclear theorists, and it is responsible for the resonance that takes place between a nucleus (for instance Pd) and the oscillation of deuterons due to zero-point energy.


After reading some of my papers, the late Dr. Eugene Mallove said in 2004: "Guglinski has interesting and intriguing ideas".
That's why he suggested to put my papers on a book form, and to publish it.

However, Dr. Mallove did not read my papers concerning the new nuclear model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to say some words concerning what said by the journalist Bob Weber:<br />
&#8220;Regardless of experimental results, one needs a convincing theory of CF&#8221;<br />
in the link:<br />
<a href="http://www.strategykinetics.com/2006/02/cold_fusion.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.strategykinetics.com/2006/02/cold_fusion.html</a></p>
<p>Before to understand cold fusion, we neeed to have a complete understanding of the nuclear phenomena.  However we dont have it.</p>
<p>In the Introduction of my book QUANTUM RING THEORY, it is written in the page 4:<br />
&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.<br />
&#8220;Perhaps one would like to say that the foundations for cold fusion are the same of that proposed in Quantum Mechanics. Indeed, in Jan-2004 the cold fusion researcher Dr. Dimitriy Afonichev sent me an e-mail where he said the following:<br />
&#8216;I think that occurrence of cold fusion can be explained on the basis of the existing theories&#8217;.<br />
Truthfully his words transmit not merely a personal opinion, because actually several theorists those try to explain the cold fusion occurrence share his viewpoint. However such opinion is very intriguing, since the own academic community is agreeing that the existing theories in the branch of Nuclear Physics are unable to explain even the ordinary nuclear properties, as confessed by Eisberg and Resnick in their book Quantum Physics, where they say in the first page of the Chapter 15:<br />
&#8216;Though we dispose nowadays of a sufficient complete assembly of information about the nuclear forces, we realize that they are too much complexes, not having been possible up to now to use this acknowledge for building an extensive theory of the nuclei. In other words, we cannot explain the whole properties of nuclei in function of the properties of the nuclear forces that actuate on their protons and neutrons&#8217;.<br />
So, as the existing theories are unable to explain the nuclear properties responsible for the hot fusion occurrence (which occurs according to the principles of Quantum Mechanics), it&#8217;s hard to believe that such existing theories could explain nuclear properties that would be responsible for the occurrence of some so much complex as it is the cold fusion (which occurs by infringing the principles of QM). &#8220;<br />
&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>For a layman to understand easily that said in the Introduction of my book, take for instance the interaction between two neutrons.<br />
Two neutrons have no repulsion.  But in a short distance, they are attracted by the strong force.  So, after interacting within a nucleus, two neutrons would have to form the 0n2, and would never separate anymore.<br />
But 0n2 does not exist in nature.  Heisenberg tried to explain it with the introduciton of the concept of Isospin.  Unfortunatelly the isospin is an abstract mathematical concept.<br />
Two neutrons tied strongly by the strong force cannot be separated by an abstract concept, because an abstract concept cannot produce a FORCE capable to win the force of attraction by the strong force.<br />
Only a FORCE of repulsion can win the force of attraction.<br />
A NEW NUCLEAR MODEL (that shows what is the force of repulsion between two neutrons in short distances) is proposed in my book Quantum Ring theory.</p>
<p>In 2002 the Infinite Energy magazine has published my paper &#8220;What is Missing in Les Case&#8217;s Catalytc Fusion&#8221; , in which I have proposed some improvements to be addopted, in order to avoid the missing of replicability.</p>
<p>In 2003 in the ICCF-10 Lets and Cravens exhibited their experiment, in which they have adopted the suggestions of mine in my paper published in 2002 by IE.</p>
<p>In my book I propose an explanation for Lets-Cravens experiment, showed in paper entitled &#8220;Lets-Cravens Experiment and the Accordion-Effect&#8221;</p>
<p>The Accordion-Effect is a nuclear property unknown by nuclear theorists, and it is responsible for the resonance that takes place between a nucleus (for instance Pd) and the oscillation of deuterons due to zero-point energy.</p>
<p>After reading some of my papers, the late Dr. Eugene Mallove said in 2004: &#8220;Guglinski has interesting and intriguing ideas&#8221;.<br />
That&#8217;s why he suggested to put my papers on a book form, and to publish it.</p>
<p>However, Dr. Mallove did not read my papers concerning the new nuclear model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.anthonares.net/2006/01/nuclear-fusion-energy-where-are-we-now.html#comment-33375</link>
		<author>Thomas</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 01:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.anthonares.net/2006/01/nuclear-fusion-energy-where-are-we-now.html#comment-33375</guid>
		<description>i agree with mut mut...even though i am in grade 8
i still understand the article
well only beacuse i like science, and one of the games i play has "Cold Fusion reactor"in it

but then global warming isn't a big problem after all
i mean i thought the summer of 2007 ws supposed to be hot!
but turned out to be much cooler than some of the other summers we lived through, my theory is that the sun melts the north and south poles but the cool air from the melted ice somehow lingered to us and we become cooler ^^
because a smart man once told me that winter is not so cold at all, the real cold is when the snow and ice melts. so i would say  the next ten years are going to be the coolest years of my life! but the excercise bikes is a good idea, perhaps they'll make it happen.

but until then, i wish you good luck on developing new Cold Fusion technology. P.S healthy people sounds like a good idea</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree with mut mut&#8230;even though i am in grade 8<br />
i still understand the article<br />
well only beacuse i like science, and one of the games i play has &#8220;Cold Fusion reactor&#8221;in it</p>
<p>but then global warming isn&#8217;t a big problem after all<br />
i mean i thought the summer of 2007 ws supposed to be hot!<br />
but turned out to be much cooler than some of the other summers we lived through, my theory is that the sun melts the north and south poles but the cool air from the melted ice somehow lingered to us and we become cooler ^^<br />
because a smart man once told me that winter is not so cold at all, the real cold is when the snow and ice melts. so i would say  the next ten years are going to be the coolest years of my life! but the excercise bikes is a good idea, perhaps they&#8217;ll make it happen.</p>
<p>but until then, i wish you good luck on developing new Cold Fusion technology. P.S healthy people sounds like a good idea</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mut Mut</title>
		<link>http://www.anthonares.net/2006/01/nuclear-fusion-energy-where-are-we-now.html#comment-33191</link>
		<author>Mut Mut</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2007 06:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.anthonares.net/2006/01/nuclear-fusion-energy-where-are-we-now.html#comment-33191</guid>
		<description>I have an idea that will resolve Unemployment, Global Warming, obesity and the depletion of un-renewable fuel sources.

Build a Huge building full of exercise bikes. Each exercise bike is attached via a belt or chain to the armature of an electrical Generator.

Problem Solved.
Perhaps healthy people, or by the choice of employer, fat people should ride the exercise bikes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have an idea that will resolve Unemployment, Global Warming, obesity and the depletion of un-renewable fuel sources.</p>
<p>Build a Huge building full of exercise bikes. Each exercise bike is attached via a belt or chain to the armature of an electrical Generator.</p>
<p>Problem Solved.<br />
Perhaps healthy people, or by the choice of employer, fat people should ride the exercise bikes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mehmettev</title>
		<link>http://www.anthonares.net/2006/01/nuclear-fusion-energy-where-are-we-now.html#comment-31464</link>
		<author>mehmettev</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 01:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.anthonares.net/2006/01/nuclear-fusion-energy-where-are-we-now.html#comment-31464</guid>
		<description>Even we can do it.Although we can't gather energy from these at least we can...

So wait and see if we can collect the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere or change the climAte everywhere with this excess energy... (After 2072,who knows :)

And a question...

Aren't these reactors superbreeding?
Can't they product the tritium needed?
Or less than needed is produced?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even we can do it.Although we can&#8217;t gather energy from these at least we can&#8230;</p>
<p>So wait and see if we can collect the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere or change the climAte everywhere with this excess energy&#8230; (After 2072,who knows <img src='http://www.anthonares.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>And a question&#8230;</p>
<p>Aren&#8217;t these reactors superbreeding?<br />
Can&#8217;t they product the tritium needed?<br />
Or less than needed is produced?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Kendall</title>
		<link>http://www.anthonares.net/2006/01/nuclear-fusion-energy-where-are-we-now.html#comment-30663</link>
		<author>Anthony Kendall</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 16:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.anthonares.net/2006/01/nuclear-fusion-energy-where-are-we-now.html#comment-30663</guid>
		<description>Mike,
The notation &lt;sup&gt;3&lt;/sup&gt;He indicates the atomic mass, not the atomic number.  The full notation would be &lt;sup&gt;3&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;He.  However, the subscript 2 is largely considered redundant when the atomic name is also given.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,<br />
The notation <sup>3</sup>He indicates the atomic mass, not the atomic number.  The full notation would be <sup>3</sup><sub>2</sub>He.  However, the subscript 2 is largely considered redundant when the atomic name is also given.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.anthonares.net/2006/01/nuclear-fusion-energy-where-are-we-now.html#comment-30462</link>
		<author>Mike</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 20:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.anthonares.net/2006/01/nuclear-fusion-energy-where-are-we-now.html#comment-30462</guid>
		<description>Helium is element 2!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Helium is element 2!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Carry</title>
		<link>http://www.anthonares.net/2006/01/nuclear-fusion-energy-where-are-we-now.html#comment-24748</link>
		<author>Jack Carry</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 04:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.anthonares.net/2006/01/nuclear-fusion-energy-where-are-we-now.html#comment-24748</guid>
		<description>I'm in school at a lower grade level but as i read this, you kept it simple enough for me to understand most of theis article, up until laser initiation. I'm very impressed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m in school at a lower grade level but as i read this, you kept it simple enough for me to understand most of theis article, up until laser initiation. I&#8217;m very impressed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Gere</title>
		<link>http://www.anthonares.net/2006/01/nuclear-fusion-energy-where-are-we-now.html#comment-8633</link>
		<author>Al Gere</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 03:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.anthonares.net/2006/01/nuclear-fusion-energy-where-are-we-now.html#comment-8633</guid>
		<description>Fusion is a pipe dream.
Solar costs too much money to manufacture &#38; Maintain the panels.
Windmills murder innocent birds.
It is time that we get used to the idea of not having electricity.
It is time that we go back to Nature.
This may require drastic measures at reducing the population, but it is necessary for Mother Gaia.
Once we have a population of, say, 10-20 million people, living in mud huts without power and sewage, plowing fields w/their hands and using their own biological waste as fertilizer...then everything should be ok...
I think we should press for that kind of a world as soon as possible, before Global Warming destroys us all...just as long as you don't expect ME to have to put up with it...after all, I'M the environmental hero and all....now where's my Hummer??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fusion is a pipe dream.<br />
Solar costs too much money to manufacture &amp; Maintain the panels.<br />
Windmills murder innocent birds.<br />
It is time that we get used to the idea of not having electricity.<br />
It is time that we go back to Nature.<br />
This may require drastic measures at reducing the population, but it is necessary for Mother Gaia.<br />
Once we have a population of, say, 10-20 million people, living in mud huts without power and sewage, plowing fields w/their hands and using their own biological waste as fertilizer&#8230;then everything should be ok&#8230;<br />
I think we should press for that kind of a world as soon as possible, before Global Warming destroys us all&#8230;just as long as you don&#8217;t expect ME to have to put up with it&#8230;after all, I&#8217;M the environmental hero and all&#8230;.now where&#8217;s my Hummer??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Traser</title>
		<link>http://www.anthonares.net/2006/01/nuclear-fusion-energy-where-are-we-now.html#comment-237</link>
		<author>Traser</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2006 10:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.anthonares.net/2006/01/nuclear-fusion-energy-where-are-we-now.html#comment-237</guid>
		<description>Hi, I just found your blogg on google while I was looking for info on tritium gas, not what I was after but hello anyway :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I just found your blogg on google while I was looking for info on tritium gas, not what I was after but hello anyway <img src='http://www.anthonares.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
