Comments on: “The P.I.G. to Science”: Evolution Misrepresented and Intelligent Design http://www.anthonares.net/2005/12/pig-to-science-evolution.html Chronicling and Commenting on Human Progress Thu, 29 Jul 2010 12:19:49 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2 By: Anthony Kendall http://www.anthonares.net/2005/12/pig-to-science-evolution.html#comment-85 Anthony Kendall Tue, 20 Dec 2005 12:44:00 +0000 http://www.anthonares.net/2005/12/pig-to-science-evolution.html#comment-85 Tom, I am going to post a summary review of his work later today or tommorrow that will link to all my chapter reviews. I will be submitting this link to LibraryThing and Amazon's reviews, but I had not planned on submitting to Bethell. Primarily this is because I am reviewing Bethell's work as a work of science, when it is very much not intended to be so. The genre listed on the back is not science, it's "Current Events." Also, Bethell has no real reason to read or respond to my review when it is in such narrow publication. Perhaps if it got broader publicity, I would send it to him. That said, I kind of like your idea. Maybe he would read and respond, though I doubt it. But it certainly wouldn't hurt to bring it to his attention. Tom,
I am going to post a summary review of his work later today or tommorrow that will link to all my chapter reviews. I will be submitting this link to LibraryThing and Amazon’s reviews, but I had not planned on submitting to Bethell.

Primarily this is because I am reviewing Bethell’s work as a work of science, when it is very much not intended to be so. The genre listed on the back is not science, it’s “Current Events.” Also, Bethell has no real reason to read or respond to my review when it is in such narrow publication. Perhaps if it got broader publicity, I would send it to him.

That said, I kind of like your idea. Maybe he would read and respond, though I doubt it. But it certainly wouldn’t hurt to bring it to his attention.

]]> By: Tom http://www.anthonares.net/2005/12/pig-to-science-evolution.html#comment-84 Tom Tue, 20 Dec 2005 12:36:00 +0000 http://www.anthonares.net/2005/12/pig-to-science-evolution.html#comment-84 I'm curious... are you going to be sending your lengthy review / blog links to the author? I'd be interested in seeing his response. Also, as far as connecting Darwinism with Athiesm, there is some truth to that. I cite the person who parks his/her car in front of mine on locust street who has the "clever" bumper ornament of the Jesus fish with feet and "Darwin" written inside it. This ornament is designed specifically to replace God with Darwin. This offends me rediculously, but that's another matter. However, not everyone connects religion with evolution, because many people could believe they co-exist, so its wrong to claim Darwinism as equivalent to athieism. Anyway, you said all this, I'm just affirming. I’m curious… are you going to be sending your lengthy review / blog links to the author? I’d be interested in seeing his response.

Also, as far as connecting Darwinism with Athiesm, there is some truth to that. I cite the person who parks his/her car in front of mine on locust street who has the “clever” bumper ornament of the Jesus fish with feet and “Darwin” written inside it. This ornament is designed specifically to replace God with Darwin. This offends me rediculously, but that’s another matter.

However, not everyone connects religion with evolution, because many people could believe they co-exist, so its wrong to claim Darwinism as equivalent to athieism. Anyway, you said all this, I’m just affirming.

]]>